HP codename, series | Monte Carlo, Pioneer |
Type, Precision, Input mode | Scientific, 12 BCD digits, exponent ±499, Algebraic |
Programmable | Yes, keystrokes, symbolic labels 0-9, A-Z. |
Performance Index | |
Memory | 10 data registers (0-9), 99 program steps, permanent memory |
Dispay | 12 digit 7-segment LCD plus sign |
Special features | Probability functions, extended statistics, 6 built-in applications that can be loaded into program memory using the LOAD key: A: One sample test statistics, B: Two sample test statistics, C: Linear regression test statistics, D: Chi-square test statistic, E: Binominal probability distribution, F: Time value of money. |
Original Pricing, Production | 3.1.1989 ($49.95) - approx. 1992 |
Batteries | 3x small button sized cells |
Dimensions | Length 14.7cm, Width 7.8cm, Height 1.5cm |
Links | |
Comment | In principle a very powerful
machine - but the lack of the RPN entry
mode really makes things unintuitve. For example the big INPUT key: On
RPN machines this would be the prominent ENTER key but here it doesn't
have much functionality. It is only used to separate inputs for certain
functions that require two arguments, like permutation and
combinations.
So you ask why addition or substraction would not be a function of two
arguments? Well, right here the confusion begins! I tried "2 INPUT 3 +"
but the result was not what I had hoped for.
The same applies to the other algebraic models: HP-10B, HP-18C, HP-19BII, HP-20S and HP-27S. The HP-30S is different in a sense that it was originally designed as an algebraic-entry model and didn't have to reuse the typical RPN style keyboard layout with the big ENTER key. The HP-17BII and HP-49G are different as well because they offer both RPN and algebraic mode. Interestingly, the algebraic models were introduced only in the later 1980s with the HP-18C in 1986 being probably the first one. Also, half of these calculators are business/financial type models: The HP-10B, HP-18C, HP-19BII, and to some extent the HP-27S. A number of developments probably influenced this decision:
|
Back To Contents |